Brooks et al v. Daniels et al, No. 3:2012cv00446 - Document 11 (W.D. Ky. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 10/30/2012;, plaintiff Michael York is DISMISSED ; Because Plaintiff York did notsubmit an application to proceed without prepayment of fees with a prisoner trust account statement fo r the six months preceding filing the complaint, the Court is unable to apportion the filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).By separate Order, the Court will order the collection of Plaintiff Yorks pro rata share of the filing fee.cc: plaintiffs pro se, defendants (TLB)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE ROBERT L. BROOKS II et al. v. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-P446-S OFFICER DANIELS et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was initiated by a complaint signed by Plaintiffs Robert L. Brooks II, Joseph Greer, and Michael York. Plaintiff Brooks submitted a completed prisoner application to proceed without prepayment of fees. On September 4, 2012, the Court entered an Order explaining that where there is more than one plaintiff, each plaintiff is responsible for his or her pro rata share of the $350.00 filing fee. Thus, Plaintiffs Brooks, Greer, and York are each responsible for one-third, or $116.65, of the filing fee. The Court ordered Plaintiffs Greer and York within 30 days to either submit a completed prisoner application to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee or pay his share, $116.65, of the filing fee. That Order warned that failure to comply would result in the dismissal as a plaintiff in this action and continued responsibility for payment of his pro rata share of the filing fee. Plaintiff York has not complied with the Court s Order. Courts have an inherent power acting on their own initiative, to clear their calendars of cases that have remained dormant because of the inaction or dilatoriness of the parties seeking relief. Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962). IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff York is DISMISSED as a plaintiff in the instant action. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) (governing involuntary dismissal). Because Plaintiff York did not submit an application to proceed without prepayment of fees with a prisoner trust account statement for the six months preceding filing the complaint, the Court is unable to apportion the filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(b)(1). By separate Order, the Court will order the collection of Plaintiff York s pro rata share of the filing fee. Date: cc: October 30, 2012 Plaintiffs, pro se Defendants 4411.009 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
