Jackson v. University of Louisville Hospital et al, No. 3:2010cv00764 - Document 6 (W.D. Ky. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 4/7/2011. Copy of the Court's Order (DN 4) was returned by the U.S. Postal Service indicating Plaintiff had refused to accept delivery (DN 5). Plaintiff has not provided the Court with an alternate address, nor taken any action in this case since December 2010. Court will dismiss action by separate Order.cc: Plaintiff, pro se (RLK)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jackson v. University of Louisville Hospital et al Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10CV-764-S JERRI LEIGH JACKSON PLAINTIFF v. UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE HOSPITAL et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION Acting without the assistance of counsel, Plaintiff Jerri Leigh Jackson filed the above-styled action against University of Louisville Hospital and the Louisville EEOC Area Office. She also applied to proceed in forma pauperis. On January 31, 2011, the Court entered an Order granting Plaintiff s application (DN 4). The Clerk of Court mailed the Order to Plaintiff at her address of record on file with the Court. On March 21, 2011, the Copy of the Court s Order was returned by the United States Postal Service indicating that Plaintiff had refused to accept delivery (DN 5). Plaintiff has not provided the Court with an alternate address nor taken any action in this case since December 2010. Upon filing the instant action, Plaintiff assumed the responsibility to keep this Court advised of a current address where she could be reached by the Court and by Defendants and to litigate her claims actively. See LR 5.2(d) ( All pro se litigants must provide written notice of a change of address to the Clerk and to the opposing party or the opposing party s counsel. Failure to notify the Clerk of an address change may result in the dismissal of the litigant s case or other appropriate sanctions. ). Plaintiff has failed in her duties. Additionally, her refusal to accept mail from the Court indicates that she no longer desires to prosecute this action. Therefore, the Dockets.Justia.com Court will dismiss this action by separate Order. April 7, 2011 Date: cc: Plaintiff, pro se 4411.008
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
