Powell v. Bowen et al, No. 3:2020cv00698 - Document 39 (N.D. Ind. 2021)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 38 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer only to the extent the deadline to respond is ENLARGED to 1/11/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 12/22/2021. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(bas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Powell v. Bowen et al Doc. 39 USDC IN/ND case 3:20-cv-00698-JD-MGG document 39 filed 12/22/21 page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ANDRE VANCE POWELL, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:20-CV-698-JD-MGG CHARLES BOWEN and CRISTINA STOBAUGH, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Charles Bowen and Cristina Stobaugh, by counsel, filed a motion asking for additional time to file a response to the complaint because of ”the length of Plaintiff’s Complaint and the issues he raises against multiple Defendants.” ECF 38 at 1. This is confusing. Andre Vance Powell, a prisoner without a lawyer, is only proceeding against two defendants on two retaliation claims which allegedly occurred on September 24, 2018. See ECF 30. Though the complaint included other claims, they were dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Id. Moreover, pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), the defendants do not need to individually respond to each paragraph of the complaint. For these reasons, the motion (ECF 38) is GRANTED only to the extent the deadline to respond is ENLARGED to January 11, 2022. SO ORDERED on December 22, 2021 s/Michael G. Gotsch, Sr. Michael G. Gotsch, Sr. United States Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com USDC IN/ND case 3:20-cv-00698-JD-MGG document 39 filed 12/22/21 page 2 of 2 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
