Cross v. Gary City of et al, No. 2:2017cv00389 - Document 49 (N.D. Ind. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 48 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims Against Co-Defendant the City of Gary. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs claims against Defendant the City of Gary are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/18/19. (mlc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cross v. Gary City of et al Doc. 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION PRINCESS CROSS, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO.: 2:17-CV-389-TLS THE CITY OF GARY and OFFICER HUDSON, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion for Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Claims Against Co-Defendant the City of Gary [ECF No. 48], filed by Plaintiff Princess Cross and Defendant City of Gary. The parties move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) for the Court to dismiss the claims against the City of Gary with prejudice. Rule 41(a)(2) allows for an action to be dismissed by court order “on terms that the court considers proper.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Because the parties stipulate to the dismissal, the Court considers the terms proper and GRANTS the Joint Motion for Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Claims Against Co-Defendant the City of Gary [ECF No. 48]. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant the City of Gary are DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED on December 18, 2019. s/ Theresa L. Springmann CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
