-RBC Gorrell v. American Healthways Services Inc et al, No. 1:2010cv00388 - Document 7 (N.D. Ind. 2010)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER; deft American Healthways Services is ORDERED to file an amended Notice of Removal forthwith, alleging on personal knowledge the citizenship of the Plaintiff and Defendant Medtronic, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 11/4/10. (lrm)

Download PDF
-RBC Gorrell v. American Healthways Services Inc et al Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL L. GORRELL, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN HEALTHWAYS SERVICES, INC. f/k/a DIABETES TREATMENT CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., and MEDTRONIC, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 1:10-CV-388 OPINION AND ORDER This case was removed to this Court from the Allen Superior Court by Defendant American Healthways Services based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Docket # 2.) The Defendant’s allegations, however, are inadequate to establish this Court’s diversity jurisdiction. American Healthways first alleges that: “The Estate of Michael L. Gorrell was opened in Allen County, Indiana, and was formed under Indiana law thereby rendering the Estate an Indiana citizen for purposes of the wrongful death action.” (Notice of Removal ¶ 3.) 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(2) provides, however, that “the legal representative of the estate of a decedent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent . . . .” See Federated Ins. Co. v. Estate of Hale, No. 1:05-CV-0392-DFH-TAB, 2005 WL 670471, at *1 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 22, 2005) (stating that the citizenship of an estate is that of the decedent at the time of death). Accordingly, American Healthways must amend its Notice of Removal to establish the citizenship of the Plaintiff. Additionally, the Notice of Removal does not address the citizenship of Defendant Dockets.Justia.com Medtronic, who has yet to be served in the underlying state court action. (Notice of Removal ¶ 6.) Although American Healthways is correct that the “non-service exception” allows removal of the case even if Medtronic does not join in the removal petition, see Sidertis v. State of Indiana, 830 F. Supp. 1156, 1159 (N.D. Ind. 1993), American Healthways must still establish the citizenship of Medtronic to ensure that complete diversity of citizenship exists.1 See generally Andreshak v. Service Heat Treating, Inc., 439 F. Supp. 2d 898 (E.D. Wis. 2006) (requiring complete diversity of citizenship even where defendant not named on removal petition because of non-service exception). Therefore, Defendant American Healthways Services is ORDERED to file an amended Notice of Removal forthwith, alleging on personal knowledge the citizenship of the Plaintiff and Defendant Medtronic, Inc. SO ORDERED. Enter for November 4, 2010. /S/ Roger B. Cosbey Roger B. Cosbey, United States Magistrate Judge 1 For purposes of determining diversity jurisdiction, each party’s citizenship must be articulated as of “the time of the filing of the complaint,” rather than the date the claims are alleged to have arisen or some other time material to the lawsuit. Multi-M Int’l, Inc. v. Paige Med. Supply Co., 142 F.R.D. 150, 152 (N.D. Ill. 1992); see Denlinger v. Brennan, 87 F.3d 214, 216 (7th Cir. 1996). Furthermore, “[a]llegations of federal subject matter jurisdiction may not be made on the basis of information and belief, only personal knowledge.” Yount v. Shashek, 472 F. Supp. 2d 1055, 1057 n.1 (S.D. Ill. 2006); Ferolie Corp. v. Advantage Sales & Mktg., LLC, No. 04 C 5425, 2004 WL 2433114, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2004); Hayes v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, No. 02 C 9106, 2003 WL 187411, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2003). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.