-RBC Tucker v. Sharp et al, No. 1:2010cv00266 - Document 3 (N.D. Ind. 2010)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Jason W Tucker, Sr. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 USC §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 9/1/10. (cer)

Download PDF
-RBC Tucker v. Sharp et al Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION JASON W. TUCKER, SR., Plaintiff, v. BRIAN SHARP, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:10 CV 266 JM OPINION AND ORDER Jason W. Tucker, Sr., a pro se plaintiff, filed an in forma pauperis petition and a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Tucker alleges that on March 29, 2008, he was arrested either without probable cause or with an invalid arrest warrant. Tucker does not say what happened after the arrest, though he does ask for the charges against him to be dismissed. It is not possible to obtain that relief in a civil rights lawsuit because habeas corpus is the exclusive remedy for a state prisoner who challenges the fact or duration of his confinement and seeks immediate or speedier release Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 481 (1994). Nevertheless, he also seeks monetary damages. Because prevailing in this civil action could not undermine the validity of his convictions, if any, it is not necessary to know whether he was convicted. See Heck and Gilbert v. Cook, 512 F.3d 899, 901 (7th Cir. 2008). However, the claims arose on the date of his arrest: that is, March 29, 2008. Indiana s two-year statute of limitations . . . is applicable to all causes of action brought in Indiana under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Snodderly v. R.U.F.F. Drug Enforcement Task Force, Dockets.Justia.com 239 F.3d 892, 894 (7th Cir. 2001). As a result, Tucker only had until March 29, 2010 to file a lawsuit related to his arrest on March 29, 2008, but this case was not filed until August 9, 2010. Therefore, it is untimely. For the foregoing reasons, the in forma pauperis petition is denied and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). SO ORDERED. Date: September 1, 2010 s/James T. Moody JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.