Shen v. Cammllarie, No. 1:2009cv00172 - Document 19 (N.D. Ind. 2009)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The Court confirms that Indiana law will apply to the present case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 11/20/09. (cer)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION TING-CHIANG SHEN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY H. CAMMLLARIE, Defendant, Cause No.: 1:09-CV-172 OPINION AND ORDER On October 9, 2009, a preliminary pre-trial conference was held in this case, during which the issue was raised of whether the law of China or Indiana applied. The parties were ordered to submit briefs on the matter, which they have now done. (Docket ## 17, 18.) Both parties agree that Indiana law should govern the present dispute. (Def. s Mem. 5, Pl. s Mem. 1.) As a general rule, [c]ourts do not worry about conflicts of laws unless the parties disagree on which state s law applies. Auto-Owners Insur. Co. v. Websolv Computing, Inc., 580 F.3d 543, 547 (7th Cir. 2009) (citing Wood v. Mid-Valley, Inc., 942 F.2d 425, 427 (7th Cir. 1991)). Furthermore, the Court finds that under the Indiana choice of law provisions, Indiana is the forum with the most intimate contacts to the facts of this dispute. See Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Recticel Foam Corp., 716 N.E.2d 1015, 1024 (Ind. App. 1999). The Court therefore confirms that Indiana law will apply to the present case. SO ORDERED. Entered for November 20, 2009. /S/ Roger B. Cosbey Roger B. Cosbey, United States Magistrate Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
