United States of America for use and benefit of Mountain Utilities, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al, No. 2:2019cv00293 - Document 274 (D. Idaho 2022)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON PREJUDGEMENT INTEREST - The Court awards Anderson and Travelers prejudgment interest at 12% running from March 15, 2021, until August 26, 2022, totaling $201,429.35 and from each day past August 26,2022, until the entry of final judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard C. Tallman. (ac)

Download PDF

United States of America for use and benefit of Mountain Utilities, I...it Company of Maryland et al Doc. 274 Case 2:19-cv-00293-RCT Document 274 Filed 09/29/22 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of MOUNTAIN UTILITIES, INC., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:19-cv-00293-RCT MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON PREJUDGMENT INTEREST v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, an Illinois corporation; ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation; AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation; WOOD ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, INC., a Nevada corporation; AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC., a Nevada corporation; ANDERSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTING, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Defendants. The Court has before it Anderson Environmental Contracting (Anderson), and Third Party Defendant Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America’s (Travelers) Motion for Prejudgment Interest (Dkt. 255). Anderson and Travelers move the Court to award prejudgment interest in the amount of $435,521.10. Id. at MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON PREJUDGMENT INTEREST - 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:19-cv-00293-RCT Document 274 Filed 09/29/22 Page 2 of 4 2. For the reasons stated below, the Court instead awards Anderson and Travelers prejudgment interest at 12% from March 15, 2021, until August 26, 2022, totaling $201,429.35, and from each day past August 26, 2022, until the entry of final judgment. After a bench trial, this Court made Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Dkt. 248) and entered Judgment in a Civil Bench Trial (Dkt. 248-1) in favor of Anderson and Travelers. The Judgment included an award of prejudgment interest at 12% per annum on the amount of $1,158,187.00 awarded to Anderson. At issue now is the date from which the prejudgment interest should be awarded. Anderson and Travelers argue prejudgment interest should run from the date of individual invoices and Change Order Requests (Dkt. 255 at 3–6). Defendants Wood and the Wood Sureties contend that if prejudgment interest is awarded, it should be calculated from the date Anderson’s expert, Gary Moorhead, submitted his report—March 15, 2021—and not from when different invoices entered into evidence show work was performed. (Dkt. 257 at 5). “Liability for interest in a suit under the Miller Act is covered by the law of the state where the contract and bond were performed.” Am. Sur. Co. of New York v. U.S. for Use & Benefit of B & B Drilling Co., 368 F.2d 475, 479 (9th Cir. 1966). Idaho’s prejudgment interest rate is 12% per annum. I.C. § 28-22-104. Under Idaho law, “[i]nterest should be allowed as a matter of law from the date the sum became due in cases where the amount claimed, even though not liquidated, is MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON PREJUDGMENT INTEREST - 2 Case 2:19-cv-00293-RCT Document 274 Filed 09/29/22 Page 3 of 4 capable of mathematical computation.” Obray v. Mitchell, 567 P.2d 1284, 1290 (Idaho 1977). A claim is liquidated if “the evidence furnishes data which, if believed, makes it possible to compute the amount with exactness, without reliance upon opinion or discretion. Ross v. Ross, 178 P.3d 639, 642 (Idaho Ct. App. 2007) (citing Seubert Excavators, Inc. v. Eucon Corp., 874 P.2d 555, 561 (Idaho Ct. App. 1993)). The Court agrees with Wood and the Wood Sureties that prejudgment interest should be calculated from March 15, 2021—the date of Anderson and Traveler’s expert’s report—and not from the dates on the individual invoices. This is because March 15, 2021, is the date on which the amounts became both liquidated and capable of mathematical computation. In both his expert report (Dkt. 83-2) and trial testimony, Anderson’s forensic accountant Moorhead discussed the additional calculations and analyses he performed that resulted in his damages estimate. Wood and the Wood Sureties received that report on March 15, 2021. (Dkt. 257 at 5–6). Accordingly, the Court finds March 15, 2021, is the date on which Wood and the Wood Sureties would have been able to calculate the damages because Moorhead’s report went beyond merely adding or subtracting numbers. He also took into account field overhead and general and administrative expenses applicable to the project— numbers that Wood and the Wood Sureties would not be able to have calculated themselves before Moorhead completed his expert report. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON PREJUDGMENT INTEREST - 3 Case 2:19-cv-00293-RCT Document 274 Filed 09/29/22 Page 4 of 4 Therefore, the Court awards Anderson and Travelers prejudgment interest at 12% running from March 15, 2021, until August 26, 2022, totaling $201,429.35 and from each day past August 26, 2022, until the entry of final judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 29, 2022 _________________________ Richard C. Tallman United States Circuit Judge MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON PREJUDGMENT INTEREST - 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.