Hugunin v. United States of America Social Security Survivor Trust Fund, No. 1:2019cv00462 - Document 6 (D. Idaho 2019)

Court Description: AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii), without leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petition to Proceed in Forma Pa uperis (docket no. 1 ) is DEEMED MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Clerk close this case. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jd) (Main Document 6 replaced on 12/16/2019, to correct the spelling of Defendant) (jd).

Download PDF
Hugunin v. United States of America Social Security Survivor Trust Fund Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO HARVEY WILLIAM HUGUNIN Case No. 1:19-CV-462-BLW Plaintiff, AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SOCIAL SECURITY SURVIVOR TRUST FUND, Defendant. INTRODUCTION The Court has before it plaintiff’s application to proceed without payment of fees. For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny the application and dismiss this case. ANALYSIS The Court is required to screen complaints brought by litigants who seek in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s Complaint, or a portion thereof, will be dismissed if it: (1) is frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii). To state a claim upon which relief can be granted, plaintiff’s Complaint must include facts sufficient to show a plausible claim Memorandum Decision & Order - 1 Dockets.Justia.com for relief. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-78 (2009). During this initial review, courts generally construe pro se pleadings liberally, giving pro se plaintiffs the benefit of any doubt. See Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). Additionally, if amending the complaint would remedy the deficiencies, plaintiffs should be notified and provided an opportunity to amend. See Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d 750, 758 (9th Cir. 2003). In this case, plaintiff claims he was abducted at birth and raised by a couple who were not his biological parents. He alleges they failed to feed him for 6 months while he was an infant and basically kept him as a prisoner in their home. He argues that he should have been placed in foster care as an orphan. Based on this story, plaintiff claims that he should have received Social Security Survivor Benefits as an orphan from the time he was born – August 6, 1953 – to his 18th birthday on August 6, 1971. In this lawsuit against the Government and the Social Security Survivor Trust Fund, he asks for a monetary recovery equal to what he should have received as an orphan. The plaintiff must exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(h) before bringing this lawsuit. See Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749, 757 (1975) (administrative exhaustion required in action for survivor’s benefits under Social Security Act). Because the plaintiff has not exhausted those remedies, the Court is without jurisdiction to hear the matter and it must be dismissed. No amendment would cure the Memorandum Decision & Order - 2 failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Court will therefore order the action dismissed. ORDER In accordance with the Memorandum Decision set forth above, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii), without leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Petition to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (docket no. 1) is DEEMED MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Clerk close this case. DATED: December 16, 2019 _________________________ B. Lynn Winmill U.S. District Court Judge Memorandum Decision & Order - 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.