Takata v. Ung, No. 1:2014cv00448 - Document 16 (D. Haw. 2015)
Court Description: EO: ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION TO DISTRICT COURT TO VACATE WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE. adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Findings and Recommendations.. (JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI)(wnn, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE< /center>Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Takata v. Ung Doc. 16 MINUTES CASE NUMBER: CIVIL NO. 14-00448LEK-BMK CASE NAME: Gary K. Takata, Trustee of the Laura Ngit Chau Ung Revocable Living Trust vs. Gertrude Ngit Wun Ung In Re: Gertrude Ngit Wun Ung Debtor; Case No. 13-01881 Chapter 13 ATTYS FOR PLA: ATTYS FOR DEFT: INTERPRETER: JUDGE: Leslie E. Kobayashi REPORTER: DATE: 08/24/2015 TIME: COURT ACTION: EO: ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION TO DISTRICT COURT TO VACATE WITHDRAWAL OF REFERENCE On August 4, 2015, this Court issued an entering order that extended the date for the withdrawal of reference from July 31, 2015 to August 5, 2015. [Dkt. no. 10.] On August 4, 2015, United States Bankruptcy Judge Robert J. Faris transmitted his Order Granting Motions for Summary Judgment (“Summary Judgment Order”). [Dkt. no. 11.] Before this Court is Judge Faris’s August 19, 2015 Recommendation to District Court to Vacate Withdrawal of Reference (“8/19/15 Recommendation”). [Dkt. no. 9.] It recommends that this Court vacate the withdrawal of reference so that Judge Faris may: 1) dispose of the motion for reconsideration of the Summary Judgment Order, filed on August 18, 2015; and 2) issue a final judgment. For the reasons set forth therein, this Court HEREBY ADOPTS the 8/19/15 Recommendation and VACATES the withdrawal of reference until November 24, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. Submitted by: Warren N. Nakamura, Courtroom Manager Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
