Trendtex Fabrics, Ltd. v. Kim, No. 1:2013cv00480 - Document 16 (D. Haw. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 . Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/31/2014. ~ Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the Findings and Recom mendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Chad Jung Kim (dba Tropical Group) are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participant Chad Jung Kim who is not registered to receive electronic notifications was served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Trendtex Fabrics, Ltd. v. Kim Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII TRENDTEX FABRICS, LTD., Plaintiff, vs. CHAD JUNG KIM (dba Tropical Group) , Defendant. ____________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV 13-00480 DKW-KSC ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on March 10, 2014, and no objections having been filed by any party, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the Findings and Recommendation to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Default // // // // Dockets.Justia.com Judgment Against Defendant Chad Jung Kim (dba Tropical Group) are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 31, 2014. /s/ Derrick K. Watson Derrick K. Watson United States District Judge Trendtex Fabrics, Ltd. v Chad Jung Kim (dba Tropical Group); CV 13-00480 DKW-KSC; ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
