DICKERSON v. WARDEN et al, No. 4:2023cv00087 - Document 9 (S.D. Ga. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER granting re 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within fourteen days of the date this Order is served. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 4/14/23. (loh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
DICKERSON v. WARDEN et al Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION THOMAS RAY DICKERSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, Coastal State Prison, OFFICER WRIGHT, and SAM, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV423-087 ORDER Plaintiff Thomas Ray Dickerson, a prisoner at the Autry State Prison, 1 submitted a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaint in the Middle District of Georgia alleging various constitutional violations related to his incarceration at Coastal State Prison. Doc. 1. He also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Doc. 2. This case was subsequently transferred from the Middle District of Georgia to this Court. Doc. 6. After reviewing Plaintiff’s IFP application, it appears that he lacks 1 Dickerson’s most recent submissions bear a return address at “Musogee,” presumably Muscogee County Jail. See doc. 5-1; see also doc. 3 at 1. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to both addresses. If Dickerson’s address is no longer Autry State Prison, he is DIRECTED to expressly inform the Clerk of his current address when he returns the forms discussed below. See S.D. Ga. L. R. 11.1. Dickerson is advised that, unless he submits a formal change of his address, no further documents will be sent to Muscogee County Jail. Dockets.Justia.com sufficient resources to prepay the filing fee. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. 2.2 Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (PLRA), all prisoners, even those who are allowed to proceed IFP, must pay the full filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Prisoner IFP litigants must pay an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of the average monthly deposits to, or average monthly balance in, the prisoner’s account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the Complaint. Prison officials are then required to collect the balance of the filing fee by deducting 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). This payment shall be forwarded to the Clerk of Court “each time the amount in plaintiff’s account exceeds $10 until the full filing fees 2 Plaintiff submitted a filing asking the Court to “dismiss this case without prejudice” so that he “can get [an] attorney to help[.]” Doc. 5 at 1-2 (cleaned up) (raising various additional allegations regarding prison officials at Muscogee County Jail). As discussed below, the Court will afford Plaintiff an opportunity to voluntarily dismiss his Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) at this time. To the extent Plaintiff seeks to voluntarily dismiss this case, he must clearly and unambiguously make that request in a motion. Alternatively, this case is subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to return the required financial forms discussed below. Plaintiff is reminded that, before this case was transferred, Judge Land of the Middle District of Georgia noted that “Plaintiff may encounter problems with the statute of limitations if he dismisses his complaint at this point.” Doc. 6 at 2 (citing Reynolds v. Murray, 170 F. App’x 49, 50-51 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (explaining that Georgia’s two-year personal injury statute of limitations governs 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights claims)). are paid.” Id. The entire filing fee must be paid even if the suit is dismissed at the outset because it is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks monetary damages against a defendant who is immune from such relief. In addition to requiring payment of the full filing fee, the PLRA now requires prisoners to exhaust all administrative remedies before challenging “prison conditions” in a civil action. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e; see 18 U.S.C. § 3626(g)(2). All prisoner civil rights actions filed after April 26, 1996, are subject to dismissal if the prisoner has not exhausted the available administrative remedies with respect to each claim asserted. Moreover, even if the Complaint is dismissed for failure to exhaust, the prisoner will still be responsible for payment of the full filing fee. The PLRA also provides that a prisoner cannot bring a new civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action in forma pauperis if the prisoner has on three or more prior occasions, while incarcerated, brought a civil action or appeal in federal court that was dismissed because it was frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The only exception to this “three strikes” rule is if the prisoner is in “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).3 Because of these legal parameters, the Court will give plaintiff an opportunity, at this time, to voluntarily dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Such a voluntary dismissal will not require plaintiff to pay the filing fee or count as a dismissal which may later subject plaintiff to the three-dismissal rule under section 1915(g). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff must furnish the enclosed Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement to the trust (financial) officer of each prison where he has been confined for the past six months. The trust officer will 3 Plaintiffs are generally required to pay a filing fee in order to institute a civil action in a federal district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1914. Indigent prisoners may avoid prepayment of the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, but must surmount § 1915(g): In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A three-striker who fails to show “imminent danger” must pay the complete $350 filing fee when he initiates suit. Vanderberg v. Donaldson, 259 F.3d 1321, 1324 (11th Cir. 2001). Short of that, the court dismisses the Complaint without prejudice. Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). complete and sign the form and return the form and supporting documents to plaintiff for submission to the Court. Two copies of the form are enclosed for this purpose. (2) Plaintiff must sign and date the enclosed Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account. By signing this form, plaintiff gives his consent to the collection of the entire filing fee from his prison account in installments, in accordance with the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. (3) Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within fourteen days of the date this Order is served. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve along with a copy of this Order (1) a Prisoner Trust Account Statement form, and (2) the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account form. Plaintiff shall have fourteen days from the service of this Order to fill out and return both forms. Once plaintiff has complied with the conditions of this Order, the Court will review plaintiff's Complaint to determine which, if any, claims are viable and which, if any, defendants should be served with a copy of the Complaint. If no response is timely received from plaintiff, the Court will presume that plaintiff desires to have this case voluntarily dismissed. Failure to comply with this Order within fourteen (14) days of the date this recommendation of Order is served dismissal of shall plaintiff's result case, in the without prejudice. SO ORDERED, this 14th day of April, 2023. _______________________________ ____________________________ HRIS ISTOPH PHER L. RAY CHRISTOPHER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
