SECKINGER v. BARNARD, No. 5:2023cv00335 - Document 5 (M.D. Ga. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Plaintiff. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 11/16/2023. (mlb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION JAMES SECKINGER, : : Plaintiff, : : V. : : CHAIRMAN TERRY E. BARNARD, : : Defendant. : _________________________________: NO. 5:23-cv-00335-MTT-MSH ORDER & RECOMMENDATION OF DISMISSAL in forma pauperis In Forma Pauperis in forma pauperis GRANTED RECOMMENDED DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE SECKINGER v. BARNARD MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Doc. 5 in forma pauperis See in forma pauperis in forma pauperis GRANTED CLERK DIRECTED in forma pauperis ORDERED CLERK 2 PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT in forma pauperis See in forma pauperis Brown v. Johnson Pro se pro se Tannenbaum v. United States 3 Miller v. Donald Id. Ashcroft v. Iqbal Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly Twombly . Id. Iqbal . Hale v. Tallapoosa Cnty. 4 . See Chappell v. Rich Id. Id. Id. Id. 5 See Seckinger v. State See Slakman v. Buckner Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Corr. Complex See Twombly Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal and Corr. Complex 6 Jones v. Ray see also McGoy v. Ray RECOMMENDED DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE OBJECTIONS WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS TWENTY (20) PAGES See See SO ORDERED and RECOMMENDED 7
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
