GOLDEN v. ASTRUE, No. 3:2009cv00058 - Document 19 (N.D. Fla. 2009)
Court Description: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: That defendant's 17 MOTION for Final Judgment be GRANTED pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on 11/17/2009. R&R flag set. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 12/15/2009. (djb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GOLDEN v. ASTRUE Doc. 19 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION BOBBY GOLDEN, Plaintiff, v. No: 3:09cv58/RV/MD MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _______________________________________________________________________ REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Defendant has filed a motion for final judgment (doc. 17) of this cause. On July 13, 2009 the court remanded this case under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. Defendant reports that upon remand, plaintiff was found eligible for benefits in a favorable Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) decision dated September 29, 2009. As plaintiff received full relief, defendant requests that the court enter a final judgment in favor of plaintiff pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Entry of a final judgment will begin the appeal period which determines the 30-day period during which a timely application for attorney fees may be made under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that defendant’s motion for final judgment (doc. 17) be GRANTED pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. At Pensacola, Florida this 17th day of November, 2009. /s/ Miles Davis MILES DAVIS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com Page 2 of 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within ten days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988). Case No: 3:09cv58/R V/MD
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
