COLLIER v. TRUMP, No. 1:2023cv01820 - Document 3 (D.D.C. 2023)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 07/12/2023. (zcb)

Download PDF
COLLIER v. TRUMP Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IRINA COLLIER, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 23-01820 (UNA) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on its initial review of Plaintiff’s pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (requiring immediate dismissal of a frivolous action). Plaintiff, a resident of San Diego, California, has sued former President Donald Trump for “Ceditious [sic] Conspiracy and contempt of court.” Compl. Caption. Plaintiff states that “this is an MDL case suppressed in Ca.[,] Washington D.C., and FL,” and “is the case of the family tied to the January 6 insurrection, to child trafficking and attempted murders of child and mother crimes outlined in all related cases[.]” Compl., ECF No. 1 at 2. The assertions continue in this incoherent manner. See id. at 2-5. Complaints premised on fantastic or delusional scenarios or supported wholly by allegations lacking “an arguable basis either in law or in fact” may be dismissed as frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). The instant complaint satisfies this standard and therefore will be dismissed. The Court cannot exercise jurisdiction over such a claim. The Dockets.Justia.com dismissal will be, however, without prejudice. A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. Date: July 12, 2023 TREVOR N. McFADDEN United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.