GETACHEW v. OMNI SHOREHAM HOTEL, No. 1:2014cv00821 - Document 10 (D.D.C. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION accompanying final order issued separately this day. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 12/2/14.(ah)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GETACHEW v. OMNI SHOREHAM HOTEL Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MESKEREM GETACHEW, Plaintiff, v. OMNI SHOREHAM HOTEL, Defendant. _______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civ. Action No. 14-0821 (ABJ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On October 14, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to respond to the motion by November 21, 2014. See Order [Dkt. # 8]. Plaintiff was warned that the failure to respond by the deadline could result in the granting of the motion as conceded. Plaintiff has neither responded to the motion nor sought additional time to respond. Hence, the Court will grant defendant’s motion as conceded and dismiss the case. See Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, 117 F.3d 571, 577 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (“Where the district court relies on the absence of a response as a basis for treating a motion as conceded, [the Court of Appeals] honor[s] its enforcement” of the local rule.); accord Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1294-95 (D.C. Cir. 2004); FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 67-68 (D.C. Cir. 1997). A separate, final order accompanies this memorandum opinion. DATE: December 2, 2014 AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
