CASTON v. BUTLER et al, No. 1:2008cv01656 - Document 38 (D.D.C. 2010)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 8/19/10. (ms, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOEL CASTON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08-1656 (JDB) JAMES BUTLER, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, brought this action against James Q. Butler, an attorney and the managing partner of law firm to which plaintiff paid a retainer for legal representation on a post-conviction in his criminal case. See Caston v. Butler, 629 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D.D.C. 2009). On December 4, 2009, the Court granted plaintiff s motion for summary judgment and entered a judgment in his favor for $5,000. Cason v. Butler, No. 08-1656, 2009 WL 4730753, at *1 (D.D.C. Dec. 4, 2009). On June 22, 2010, the Court denied plaintiff s demand for punitive damages, awarded pre-judgment interest, and determined that there may be a basis for a further award of compensatory damages. Caston v. Butler, No. 08-1656, 2010 WL 2505591, at *2 (D.D.C. June 22, 2010). Given plaintiff s pro se status, the Court afforded plaintiff an opportunity to submit specific documentation of any actual expenditures which would be recoverable as additional compensatory damages. See id. Plaintiff represents that he unable to provide specific documentation (bills, invoices, receipts, etc.) of any actual expenditures incurred in attempting to hire another attorney. Pl. s -1- Resp. to Order of the Court [Dkt. #37]. Defendant Butler has not filed an opposition or any other response to plaintiff s submission. It appears, then, that all issues presented in this case have been resolved, and this civil action will be dismissed. The total judgment in favor of plaintiff as reflected in the Court s prior orders will remain at $5,140.30. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. /s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge DATE: August 19, 2010 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
