Configair LLC v. Kurz, No. 3:2017cv02026 - Document 119 (D. Conn. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth in the attach ed Ruling, the partial motion to dismiss HKC's Complaint is denied with respect to Count III and granted with respect to Count V. The motion to dismiss Kurz's Amended Third Party Complaint is granted with respect to Count II (including both the direct and derivative claims), granted with respect to Counts I and III's direct claims, denied with respect to Count I and III's derivative claims, and denied with respect to Count IV. ConfigAir's Motion for Judgment on the Plead ings is denied with respect to Counts I and II of ConfigAir's Second Amended Complaint. The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted with respect to Counts II and III of Kurz's Counterclaims, granted with respect to Count X's direct claim, denied with respect to Count X's derivative claim, and denied with respect to all remaining Counts. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 7/31/19. (Kolker, J.)

Download PDF
Configair LLC v. Kurz Doc. 119 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.