USA v. 2007 Monaco M-40PDQ Motor Home VIN 1RF43464X72043536 et al, No. 1:2010cv02855 - Document 67 (D. Colo. 2012)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of USA against the Defendant Property re: 66 Order, by Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk on 10/11/12. (alvsl)

Download PDF
USA v. 2007 Monaco M-40PDQ Motor Home VIN 1RF43464X72043536 et al Doc. 67 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 10-cv-02855-WJM-KMT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2007 MONACO M-40PDQ MOTOR HOME VIN 1RF43464X72043536, 2005 OPTIMA UTILITY TRAILER VIN 5MVWB24255E001500, $104,800.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY, $83,000.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY, and $4,725.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Final Order of Forfeiture, entered by the Honorable William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on October 9, 2012, IT IS ORDERED that a forfeiture of 1. Defendant 2007 Monaco Motor Home VIN 1RF43464X72043536; 2. Defendant 2005 Optima Utility Trailer VIN 5MVWB24255E001500; 3. Defendant $104.800.00 United States Currency; 4. $68,000.00 of defendant $83,000.00 United States Currency; 5. Defendant $4,725.00 United States Currency; is entered in favor of the United States, the United States shall have full and legal title to the defendant property, and may dispose of it in accordance with law and in accordance Dockets.Justia.com with the terms and provisions of the parties’ Settlement Agreement; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Final Judgment is entered for the United States of America, and a Certificate of Reasonable Cause, which the Final Order of Forfeiture constitutes, is GRANTED as to all defendant property pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. Dated this 11th day of October 2012, at Denver, Colorado. APPROVED: BY THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK Judge William J. Martínez United States District Court By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.