Radick v. Ippolito et al, No. 1:2010cv02504 - Document 114 (D. Colo. 2012)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 113 Order on 9/28/12. (lygsl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Radick v. Ippolito et al Doc. 114 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-02504-DME-KLM THOMAS RADICK, Plaintiff, v. MARK IPPOLITO, Health Services Administrator, FCI Englewood, DR. KRAUSE, Physician, FCI Englewood, MR. GARZA, Physician’s Assistant, FCI Englewood, NURSE WAGONER, Nurse, FCI Englewood, MRS. LEYBA, Administrative Hearing Officer, FCI Englewood, MR. WALDO, Case Manager, FCI Englewood, MS. DONSANJ, Unit Manager, FCI Englewood, and MR. WATTS, F.B.O.P. Administrative Remedy Coordinator, Central Office, in his official and individual capacity, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ FINAL JUDGMENT _____________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the orders entered during the course of proceedings in this case, the following final judgment is hereby entered. I. Pursuant to and in accordance with the Order to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge entered by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on January 12, 2011, Defendants Harley Lappin, Mike Nally, Mr. Fields, and Rene Garcia are dismissed as parties to this action. II. Pursuant to and in accordance with the Order Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered by U.S. Circuit Court Judge David M. Ebel on September 21, 2012, incorporated herein by reference, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. 111) is ADOPTED IN FULL, and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s earlier Recommendation (Doc. 94). 2. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Ippolito, Krause, Dockets.Justia.com Civil Action No. 10-cv-02504-DME-KLM Page 2 Garza, Wagoner, Leyba, Waldo, and Donsanj (Doc. 86) is GRANTED. 3. Defendant Watts’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 108) is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART (as to the assertion challenging personal jurisdiction), and DENIED AS MOOT IN PART. 4. Defendant Watts’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 109) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this civil action is dismissed without prejudice. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 28th day of September, 2012. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler Deputy Clerk
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
