Estate of William Hayden Schuck et al v. County of San Diego et al, No. 3:2023cv00785 - Document 29 (S.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 10 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Discovery to Ascertain Doe Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 6/16/2023. (hmw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT LIMITED DISCOVERY TO ASCERTAIN DOE DEFENDANTS [ECF No. 10] Estate of William Hayden Schuck et al v. County of San Diego et al Doc. 29 Ex Parte Id GRANTS IN PART DENIES IN PART I. BACKGROUND see Id II. LEGAL STANDARD see Rovio Entm’t Ltd. v. Royal Plush Toys, Inc. Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron Am., Inc Am. LegalNet, Inc. v. Davis see, e.g. Synopsys, Inc. v. AzurEngine Techs., Inc Palermo v. Underground Solutions, Inc. Wakefield v. Thompson Civiletti Gillespie v. Columbia Ins. Co. v. Seescandy.com Id. III. PARTIES’ POSITIONS Compare Id with and DENIES Id Id Id Id Id Id Id Id i.e. Id Id Id Id IV. DISCUSSION Am. LegalNet Palermo Palermo Compare Columbia Ins. Co Palermo with Palermo Columbia Ins. Co See Columbia Ins Co. see Raiser v. San Diego Cnty see Raiser Ashcroft v. Iqbal Corp. v. Twombly Cmty. Corrs. Ctr. Staff & Affiliates Bell Atl. Finefeuiaki v. Maui Finefeuiaki Finefeuiaki see Finefeuiaki id id Id Id Compare Keavney v. Cnty. of San Diego sua sponte in forma pauperis with and id and id and id Columbia Ins. Co. Semitool V. CONCLUSION GRANTS IN PART DENIES IN PART Ex Parte June 30, 2023 IT IS SO ORDERED. See
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
