Morneau et al v. Protective Life Insurance Company, No. 3:2022cv01861 - Document 27 (S.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER Granting 26 Joint Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines, and Issuing FIRST AMENEDED SCHEDULING ORDER. Settlement Conference set for 6/5/2023 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 5/3/2023. (hmw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Morneau et al v. Protective Life Insurance Company Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 CRISTIN MORNEAU, individually; KELLY STRANGE, individually; AND Cristin Morneau and Kelly Strange, jointly as successors-in-interest to Carolyn A. Morneau and on behalf of the ESTATE OF CAROLYN A. MORNEAU, 16 17 18 19 Case No.: 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG ORDER: (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES, and Plaintiffs, (2) ISSUING FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER v. PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, [ECF No. 26] Defendant. 20 21 22 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to amend the scheduling order. ECF 23 No. 26. The parties seek an order from the Court extending certain discovery deadlines by 24 approximately 60 days. Id. 25 Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good 26 cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with 27 the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 24 at 6 (Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates set forth 28 herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); see also Chmb.R. at 2 (stating 1 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG Dockets.Justia.com 1 that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”). 2 “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across 3 procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 4 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence of the party seeking to 5 amend the scheduling order and the reasons for seeking modification. Johnson v. Mammoth 6 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992) (“[T]he focus of the inquiry is upon 7 the moving party’s reasons for seeking modification. . . . If that party was not diligent, the 8 inquiry should end.”) (internal citation omitted). Therefore, “a party demonstrates good 9 cause by acting diligently to meet the original deadlines set forth by the court.” Merck v. 10 Swift Transp. Co., No. CV-16-01103-PHX-ROS, 2018 WL 4492362, at *2 (D. Ariz. Sept. 11 19, 2018). 12 Here, the parties have represented to the Court that they have been working 13 diligently to abide by the Court’s Scheduling Order (ECF Nos. 24). ECF No. 26. The 14 parties represent that both sides have propounded interrogatories, requests for production 15 (“RFP”), and requests for admission (“RFA”). Id. at 4. Discovery responses have been 16 served, including several thousand pages of documents. Id. The parties “are exploring 17 settlement” and seek an order from the Court extending the fact discovery deadline and 18 discovery dispute notification deadline by approximately 60 days so that they can evaluate 19 the potential for early settlement without having to simultaneously litigate the case and 20 take depositions. Id. 21 The Court appreciates the parties’ thorough motion, and that the parties have been 22 working together and have diligently pursued discovery. Thus, the Court finds good cause 23 to GRANT IN PART1 the motion. ECF No. 26. The Court issues the following Amended 24 Scheduling Order: 25 26 27 28 Though “[t]he parties do not currently anticipate that the requested extension will have any effect on the other dates and deadlines in place in this matter,” (ECF No. 26 at 4), due to the length of the extension, certain (not all) pretrial deadlines have been modified. 1 2 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG 1 1. Given that the parties are exploring settlement, the Court finds that a 2 settlement conference will be beneficial. As such, a Settlement Conference shall be 3 conducted on June 5, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. via videoconference before Magistrate Judge 4 Allison H. Goddard.2 The Court requires the personal attendance of all parties, party 5 representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, and the primary 6 attorney(s) responsible for the litigation at the conference. Each party must prepare a 7 Confidential Settlement Letter, to be lodged no later May 26, 2023. The Confidential 8 Letter must be lodged in .pdf format via email to efile goddard@casd.uscourts.gov (not 9 filed). The substance of the Confidential Letter must comply fully with Judge Goddard’s 10 Mandatory Settlement Conference Rules (located at 11 https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/goddard/docs/Goddard%20Mandatory%20Settlem 12 ent%20Conference%20Rules.pdf). No later than May 26, 2023, each party must submit to 13 the Court via email (not filed) (at efile goddard@casd.uscourts.gov) the names, titles, and 14 email addresses of all attendees. The Court will then send out the Zoom invitation to all 15 attendees. All participants shall display the same level of professionalism during the 16 Settlement Conference and be prepared to devote their full attention to the Settlement 17 Conference as if they were attending in person, i.e., cannot be driving or in a car while 18 speaking to the Court. Because Zoom may quickly deplete the battery of a participant’s 19 device, each participant should ensure that their device is plugged in or that a charging 20 cable is readily available during the video conference. Counsel are advised that although 21 the Settlement Conference will take place on Zoom, all participants shall appear and 22 conduct themselves as if it is proceeding in a courtroom, i.e., all participants must dress in 23 appropriate courtroom attire. 24 // 25 26 27 28 2 Upon receipt of a joint email (to efile goddard@casd.uscourts.gov) containing a firm date for private mediation and the name of the mediator, the settlement conference will come off calendar. 3 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG 1 2. By August 14, 2023, if the parties reach an impasse after substantial meet and 2 confer efforts, the parties may bring any discovery dispute to the Court’s attention via email 3 (at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov) regarding: (1) Plaintiff Morneau’s responses to 4 written discovery served on March 31, 2023; (2) Defendant’s responses to RFPs served on 5 April 13, 2023; (3) Defendant’s responses to interrogatories and RFAs served on 6 April 21, 2023; and (4) Plaintiff Strange’s responses to written discovery served on 7 May 1, 2023. 8 3. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by August 29, 2023. 9 “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil 10 Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of 11 time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking 12 into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of 13 Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with regard 14 to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). A failure to comply 15 in this regard will result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an order of 16 the court, no stipulation continuing or altering this requirement will be recognized by 17 the court. The Court expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all disputes without 18 court intervention through the meet and confer process. 19 impasse 20 efile goddard@casd.uscourts.gov no later than 45 days after the date of service of the 21 written discovery response that is in dispute, seeking a telephonic conference with the 22 Court to discuss the discovery dispute. The email must include: (1) at least three proposed 23 times mutually agreed upon by the parties for the telephonic conference; (2) a neutral 24 statement of the dispute; and (3) one sentence describing (not arguing) each parties’ 25 position. The movant must copy opposing counsel on the email. No discovery motion may 26 be filed until the Court has conducted its pre-motion telephonic conference, unless the 27 movant has obtained leave of Court. All parties are ordered to read and to fully comply 28 with the Chambers Rules of Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. on any discovery issue, the movant must If the parties reach an e-mail chambers at 4 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG 1 4. The parties shall designate their respective experts in writing by 2 September 19, 2023. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(A), the parties must identify 3 any person who may be used at trial to present evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 4 of the Fed. R. Evid. This requirement is not limited to retained experts. The date for 5 exchange of rebuttal experts shall be by October 10, 2023. The written designations shall 6 include the name, address and telephone number of the expert and a reasonable summary 7 of the testimony the expert is expected to provide. The list shall also include the normal 8 rates the expert charges for deposition and trial testimony. 9 5. By September 19, 2023, each party shall comply with the disclosure 10 provisions in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This 11 disclosure requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide 12 expert testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving 13 of expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails 14 to make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to 15 use evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In 16 addition, the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c). 17 6. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal 18 evidence under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(D) and 26(e) by 19 October 10, 2023. 20 7. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties by October 31, 2023. 21 The parties shall comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph governing 22 fact discovery. 23 8. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court 24 may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on 25 the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 26 9. All other pretrial motions must be filed by November 20, 2023. Counsel for 27 the moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who 28 will hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and 5 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG 1 the hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. 2 Failure to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. 3 Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as otherwise set by the 4 district judge. 5 10. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c), if an opposing party fails to file 6 opposition papers in the time and manner required by Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), that 7 failure may constitute a consent to the granting of a motion or other request for ruling by 8 the court. Accordingly, all parties are ordered to abide by the terms of Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) 9 or otherwise face the prospect of any pretrial motion being granted as an unopposed motion 10 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c). Should either party choose to file or oppose a 11 motion for summary judgment or partial summary judgment, no Separate Statement of 12 Disputed or Undisputed Facts is required. 13 11. A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted on January 24, 2024 14 at 9:30 a.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. Plaintiff must 15 serve on Defendant a written settlement proposal, which must include a specific demand 16 amount, no later than January 3, 2024. The defendant must respond to the plaintiff in 17 writing with a specific offer amount prior to the Meet and Confer discussion. The parties 18 should not file or otherwise copy the Court on these exchanges. Rather, the parties must 19 include their written settlement proposals in their respective Settlement Conference 20 Statements to the Court. Counsel for the parties must meet and confer in person or by 21 phone no later than January 10, 2024. Each party must prepare a Settlement Conference 22 Statement, which will be served on opposing counsel and lodged with the Court no later 23 than January 17, 2024. The Statement must be lodged in .pdf format via email to 24 efile goddard@casd.uscourts.gov (not filed). The substance of the Settlement Conference 25 Statement must comply fully with Judge Goddard’s Mandatory Settlement Conference 26 Rules (located at 27 https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/goddard/docs/Goddard%20Mandatory%20Settlem 28 ent%20Conference%20Rules.pdf). Each party may also prepare an optional Confidential 6 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG 1 Settlement Letter for the Court’s review only, to be lodged with the Court no later than 2 January 17, 2024. 3 efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov (not filed). Should a party choose to prepare a Letter, 4 the substance of the Settlement Conference Letter must comply fully with Judge Goddard’s 5 Mandatory Settlement Conference Rules. All parties are ordered to read and to fully 6 comply with the Chambers Rules and Mandatory Settlement Conference Rules of 7 Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. 8 12. The Letter must be lodged in .pdf format via email to Despite the requirements of Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(2), neither party is 9 required to file a Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law at any time. The parties 10 shall instead focus their efforts on drafting and submitting a proposed pretrial order by the 11 time and date specified by Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(6)(b). The proposed pretrial order shall 12 comply with Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(6) and the Standing Order in Civil Cases issued by 13 the assigned district judge. 14 13. Counsel shall comply with the pre-trial disclosure requirements of Fed. R. 15 Civ. P. 26(a)(3) by March 4, 2024. Failure to comply with these disclosure requirements 16 could result in evidence preclusion or other sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. 17 14. Counsel shall meet and take the action required by Local Rule 16.1(f)(4) by 18 March 11, 2024. 19 stipulations and agreements resulting in simplification of the triable issues. Counsel shall 20 exchange copies and/or display all exhibits other than those to be used for impeachment. 21 The exhibits shall be prepared in accordance with Local Rule 16.1(f)(4)(c). Counsel shall 22 note any objections they have to any other parties’ Pretrial Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. 23 P. 26(a)(3). Counsel shall cooperate in the preparation of the proposed pretrial conference 24 order. 25 15. At this meeting, counsel shall discuss and attempt to enter into Counsel for plaintiff will be responsible for preparing the pretrial order and 26 arranging the meetings of counsel pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1(f). 27 March 18, 2024, plaintiff’s counsel must provide opposing counsel with the proposed 28 pretrial order for review and approval. Opposing counsel must communicate promptly By 7 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG 1 with plaintiff’s attorney concerning any objections to form or content of the pretrial order, 2 and both parties shall attempt promptly to resolve their differences, if any, concerning the 3 order. 4 16. The Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order, including objections to any 5 other parties’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures shall be prepared, served and 6 lodged with the assigned district judge by March 25, 2024, and shall be in the form 7 prescribed in and comply with Local Rule 16.1(f)(6). 8 17. In addition to submitting the proposed final pretrial conference order, the 9 parties are further ordered to separately submit informal letter briefs, not exceeding two 10 single spaced pages, served on opposing counsel and received in the chambers of Judge 11 Thomas J. Whelan, United States District Judge (and not filed with the Clerk’s Office) by 12 2:30 p.m. on March 25, 2024. The letter brief should be a relatively informal and 13 straightforward document. The letter brief should outline a short, concise and objective 14 factual summary of the party’s case in chief, the number of hours/days each party intends 15 to expend at trial, the approximate number of witnesses, whether certain witnesses will be 16 coming in from out of town, the number of testifying expert witnesses, whether any unique 17 demonstrative exhibits may be presented, the number of proposed motions in limine that 18 may be filed, precisely when the parties would be prepared to submit their in limine papers 19 (and whether the parties have met and conferred with respect to in limine issues), the issue 20 of proposed jury instructions and when the parties intend to submit them before trial, and 21 voir dire issues, either party’s preference as to what date(s) the trial should begin and any 22 other pertinent information that either party may deem useful to assist the Court in the 23 execution of the pretrial conference and in setting the matter for trial. 24 25 26 27 28 18. The final Pretrial Conference is scheduled on the calendar of the Honorable Thomas J. Whelan on April 1, 2024 at 10:30 a.m. 19. The parties must review the chambers’ rules for the assigned district judge and magistrate judge. 20. A post trial settlement conference before a magistrate judge may be held 8 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG 1 2 3 4 within 30 days of verdict in the case. 21. The dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown. 22. Briefs or memoranda in support of or in opposition to any pending motion 5 shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length without leave of a district court judge. 6 No reply memorandum shall exceed ten (10) pages without leave of a district court judge. 7 Briefs and memoranda exceeding ten (10) pages in length shall have a table of contents 8 and a table of authorities cited. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 3, 2023 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9 3:22-cv-01861-W-AHG
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
