Frias v. County of San Diego et al, No. 3:2022cv00675 - Document 46 (S.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER Granting In Part 44 Joint Motion to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines, and Issuing FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER. (Mandatory Settlement Conference set for 6/21/2024 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 8/21/2024. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/28/2024 at 9:30 AM before Judge Jinsook Ohta). Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 7/11/2023. (hmw)

Download PDF
Frias v. County of San Diego et al Doc. 46 Case 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Document 46 Filed 07/11/23 PageID.359 Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH FRIAS, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 15 ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART JOINT MOTION TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER, and Defendants. 16 (2) ISSUING FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER 17 18 [ECF No. 44] 19 20 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to amend the scheduling order. ECF 21 No. 44. The parties represent to the Court that they have diligently propounded written 22 discovery and have taken multiple depositions in this matter. Id. at 3. After reviewing video 23 footage and thousands of pages of document production, Plaintiff amended his complaint 24 to name individual deputy defendants. ECF No. 44-1 at 3; see ECF No. 42. Plaintiff intends 25 to depose the recently-added named defendants and other medical providers; however, 26 Plaintiff’s counsel has an upcoming two-week trial, with extensive preparation needed, as 27 well as depositions scheduled in another case. ECF No. 44 at 3. Thus, the parties request a 28 three-month continuance of all scheduling order deadlines. Id. at 4–5. The Court 1 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Document 46 Filed 07/11/23 PageID.360 Page 2 of 6 1 appreciates the parties’ thorough motion and concludes that the parties have demonstrated 2 the diligence necessary for a finding of good cause. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, 3 Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (“the focus of the [good cause] inquiry is upon the 4 moving party’s reasons for seeking modification. . . . If that party was not diligent, the 5 inquiry should end.”); Merck v. Swift Transp. Co., No. CV-16-01103-PHX-ROS, 2018 WL 6 4492362, at *2 (D. Ariz. Sept. 19, 2018) (“a party demonstrates good cause by acting 7 diligently to meet the original deadlines set forth by the court”). Thus, the Court GRANTS1 8 the joint motion and issues the following First Amended Scheduling Order: 9 1. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by November 16, 2023. 10 “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of 12 time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking 13 into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of 14 Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with 15 regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). A failure to 16 comply in this regard will result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an 17 order of the court, no stipulation continuing or altering this requirement will be 18 recognized by the court. The Court expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all 19 disputes without court intervention through the meet and confer process. If the parties 20 reach an impasse on any discovery issue, the movant must e-mail chambers at 21 efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov no later than 45 days after the date of service of the 22 written discovery response that is in dispute, seeking a telephonic conference with the 23 Court to discuss the discovery dispute. The email must include: (1) at least three proposed 24 times mutually agreed upon by the parties for the telephonic conference; (2) a neutral 25 26 27 28 1 The parties’ proposed pretrial conference date was unavailable on the Court’s calendar, and the parties’ proposed mandatory settlement conference date was on a federal holiday. Thus, the instant amended scheduling order is slightly different from the schedule requested by the parties. 2 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Case 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Document 46 Filed 07/11/23 PageID.361 Page 3 of 6 1 statement of the dispute; and (3) one sentence describing (not arguing) each parties’ 2 position. The movant must copy opposing counsel on the email. No discovery motion may 3 be filed until the Court has conducted its pre-motion telephonic conference, unless the 4 movant has obtained leave of Court. All parties are ordered to read and to fully comply 5 with the Chambers Rules of Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. 6 2. The parties shall designate their respective experts in writing by 7 December 15, 2023. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to 8 present evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Fed. R. Evid. This requirement 9 is not limited to retained experts. The date for exchange of rebuttal experts shall be by 10 January 16, 2024. The written designations shall include the name, address and telephone 11 number of the expert and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is expected to 12 provide. The list shall also include the normal rates the expert charges for deposition and 13 trial testimony. 14 3. By December 15, 2023, each party shall comply with the disclosure 15 provisions in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This 16 disclosure requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide 17 expert testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving 18 of expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails 19 to make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to 20 use evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In 21 addition, the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c). 22 23 24 4. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal evidence under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) by January 16, 2024. 5. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties by February 16, 2024. 25 The parties shall comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph governing 26 fact discovery. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court 27 may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on 28 the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 3 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Case 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Document 46 Filed 07/11/23 PageID.362 Page 4 of 6 1 6. All other pretrial motions must be filed by April 12, 2024. Counsel for the 2 moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will 3 hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and the 4 hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. Failure 5 to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. 6 Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as otherwise set by the 7 district judge. 8 7. A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted on June 21, 2024 at 9 9:30 a.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. Defendant must 10 serve on Plaintiff a written settlement proposal, which must include a specific demand 11 amount, no later than May 31, 2024. The plaintiff must respond to the plaintiff in writing 12 with a specific offer amount prior to the Meet and Confer discussion. The parties should 13 not file or otherwise copy the Court on these exchanges. Rather, the parties must include 14 their written settlement proposals in their respective Settlement Conference Statements to 15 the Court. Counsel for the parties must meet and confer in person or by phone no later 16 than June 7, 2024. Each party must prepare a Settlement Conference Statement, which will 17 be served on opposing counsel and lodged with the Court no later than June 13, 2024. The 18 Statement must be lodged in .pdf format via email to efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov 19 (not filed). The substance of the Settlement Conference Statement must comply fully with 20 Judge Goddard’s Mandatory Settlement Conference Rules (located at 21 https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/goddard/docs/Goddard%20Mandatory%20Settlem 22 ent%20Conference%20Rules.pdf). Each party may also prepare an optional Confidential 23 Settlement Letter for the Court’s review only, to be lodged with the Court no later than 24 June 13, 2024. The Letter must be lodged in .pdf format via email to 25 efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov (not filed). Should a party choose to prepare a Letter, 26 the substance of the Settlement Conference Letter must comply fully with Judge Goddard’s 27 Mandatory Settlement Conference Rules. All parties are ordered to read and to fully 28 comply with the Chambers Rules and Mandatory Settlement Conference Rules of 4 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Case 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Document 46 Filed 07/11/23 PageID.363 Page 5 of 6 1 Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. 2 3 8. Counsel do not need to file Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law if the trial will be a jury trial. 4 9. Counsel shall comply with the pre-trial disclosure requirements of Fed. R. 5 Civ. P. 26(a)(3) by July 31, 2024. Failure to comply with these disclosure requirements 6 could result in evidence preclusion or other sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. 7 10. Counsel shall meet and take the action required by Local Rule 16.1(f)(4) by 8 August 7, 2024. 9 stipulations and agreements resulting in simplification of the triable issues. Counsel shall 10 exchange copies and/or display all exhibits other than those to be used for impeachment. 11 The exhibits shall be prepared in accordance with Local Rule 16.1(f)(4)(c). Counsel shall 12 note any objections they have to any other parties’ Pretrial Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. 13 P. 26(a)(3). Counsel shall cooperate in the preparation of the proposed pretrial conference 14 order. 15 11. At this meeting, counsel shall discuss and attempt to enter into Counsel for plaintiff will be responsible for preparing the pretrial order and 16 arranging the meetings of counsel pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1(f). 17 August 14, 2024, plaintiff’s counsel must provide opposing counsel with the proposed 18 pretrial order for review and approval. Opposing counsel must communicate promptly 19 with plaintiff’s attorney concerning any objections to form or content of the pretrial order, 20 and both parties shall attempt promptly to resolve their differences, if any, concerning the 21 order. 22 12. By The Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order, including objections to any 23 other parties’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures shall be prepared, served and 24 lodged with the assigned district judge by August 21, 2024, and shall be in the form 25 prescribed in and comply with Local Rule 16.1(f)(6). 26 27 28 13. The final Pretrial Conference is scheduled on the calendar of the Honorable Jinsook Ohta on August 28, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. 14. The parties must review the chambers’ rules for the assigned magistrate judge. 5 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Case 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG Document 46 Filed 07/11/23 PageID.364 Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 15. A post trial settlement conference before a magistrate judge may be held within 30 days of verdict in the case. 16. The dates and times set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown. 17. Briefs or memoranda in support of or in opposition to any pending motion 6 shall not exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length without leave of a district court judge. 7 No reply memorandum shall exceed ten (10) pages without leave of a district court judge. 8 Briefs and memoranda exceeding ten (10) pages in length shall have a table of contents 9 and a table of authorities cited. 10 11 12 13 18. Plaintiff’s counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter this case hereafter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 11, 2023 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 3:22-cv-00675-JO-AHG

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.