1944 Northern District of California US Federal District Court Case Law

Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Date: November 17, 1944
Citation: 58 F. Supp. 25
Docket Number: 23243-R
In Re Laws
Date: November 10, 1944
Citation: 59 F. Supp. 179
Docket Number: 77330
SAN FRANCISCO LODGE NO. 68, ETC. v. Forrestal
Date: October 23, 1944
Citation: 58 F. Supp. 466
Docket Number: 23721
In Re Buzas
Date: October 19, 1944
Citation: 58 F. Supp. 717
Docket Number: 9490
American Ins. Co. v. Bradley Mining Co.
Date: October 18, 1944
Citation: 57 F. Supp. 545
Docket Number: 23461
Baker v. Moore-McCormack Lines
Date: September 29, 1944
Citation: 57 F. Supp. 207
Docket Number: 23527-R
United States v. San Francisco Electrical Cont. Ass'n
Date: September 5, 1944
Citation: 57 F. Supp. 57
Docket Number: 26893-R
Markall v. Bowles
Date: September 5, 1944
Citation: 58 F. Supp. 463
Docket Number: 23548-C
Stutz v. BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, ETC.
Date: August 28, 1944
Citation: 56 F. Supp. 810
Docket Numbers: 4926, 4938
United States v. Masaaki Kuwabara
Date: July 22, 1944
Citation: 56 F. Supp. 716
Docket Number: 8966-G
United States v. 13.40 Acres of Land in City of Richmond
Date: July 15, 1944
Citation: 56 F. Supp. 535
Docket Number: 22764-G
Glaeser v. Acacia Mut. Life Ass'n
Date: June 6, 1944
Citation: 55 F. Supp. 925
Docket Number: 23215-G
United States v. BUILDING, ETC.
Date: May 26, 1944
Citation: 55 F. Supp. 667
Docket Number: 22314-G
Fred Benioff Co. v. Benioff
Date: March 6, 1944
Citation: 55 F. Supp. 393
Docket Number: 22033
North Coast Transp. Co. v. United States
Date: March 2, 1944
Citation: 54 F. Supp. 448
Docket Number: 22528-S
Gayner v. the New Orleans
Date: January 29, 1944
Citation: 54 F. Supp. 25
Docket Number: 23487
Christianson v. West Pub. Co.
Date: January 18, 1944
Citation: 53 F. Supp. 454
Docket Number: 22736-R
Bowles v. Chew
Date: January 13, 1944
Citation: 53 F. Supp. 787
Docket Number: 22778-G
United States v. Holtz
Date: January 10, 1944
Citation: 54 F. Supp. 63
Docket Number: 22398-G

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.