Hackler et al v. City of Dyer, Arkansas et al, No. 2:2017cv02124 - Document 29 (W.D. Ark. 2018)
Court Description: JUDGMENT entered pursuant to 28 Opinion and Order entered this date. Plaintiff's claims raised in counts 3, 6, 7 and 8 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's procedural due process claim in count 9 and state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on May 23, 2018. (hnc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hackler et al v. City of Dyer, Arkansas et al Doc. 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION LEE HACKLER and PATRICIA HACKLER v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 2:17-CV-2124 CITY OF DYER, ARKANSAS and LONNIE ROBINS AND VERONICA ROBINS, individually and in their capacity as official agents of the City of Dyer, Arkansas JUDGMENT DEFENDANTS Pursuant to the order entered in this case on this date, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs’ claims raised in counts three, six, seven, and eight of the complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Plaintiff’s procedural due process claim raised in count nine and state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ADJUDGED this 23rd day of May, 2018. /s/P. K. Holmes, III P.K. HOLMES, III CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
