Banks v. Kelley et al, No. 5:2018cv00293 - Document 27 (E.D. Ark. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 16 findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice Banks's access to the courts and retaliation claims, and denying his motion for a preliminary injunction; and dismissing without prejudice defendants Straughn, Gibson, Linsy, Shipman, Washington, and Moore. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/28/2019. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Banks v. Kelley et al Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION NICKARLOS A. BANKS ADC #154527 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:18-CV-00293 BSM WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER After a de novo review of the record, including plaintiff Nickarlos A. Banks’s objections [Doc. No. 22], United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere’s findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 16] are adopted. Banks’s access to the courts and retaliation claims are dismissed without prejudice, and his motion for a preliminary injunction is denied. Defendants Straughn, Gibson, Linsy, Shipman, Washington, and Moore are dismissed without prejudice from this case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of February 2019. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
