Davis v. Bolden et al, No. 5:2014cv00454 - Document 10 (E.D. Ark. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER denying 4 Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations. The Court will construe Plaintiff's 7 objections as a supplement to his complaint. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/2/2015. (mcz)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Davis v. Bolden et al Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BILLY JOE DAVIS, JR. v. PLAINTIFF 5:14CV000454-JM-JTK BOLDEN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. The Court has reviewed those proposed findings and recommendations, the timely objections received thereto, and made a de novo review of the record. It appears from his objections that Plaintiff is now claiming that Defendants Bolden, Tyler and Adams failed to ensure that Plaintiff receive proper medical care. Although Plaintiff was previously allowed to amend his Complaint and failed to do so, the Court will construe these objections as a supplement to his complaint. In light of these new allegations, the Court declines to adopt the Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations [4] are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2015. __________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
