Hunt v. Hurst et al, No. 4:2021cv00181 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; dismissing, without prejudice, Plaintiff Antonio Hunt's complaint; recommending that this dismissal of this action constitute a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/9/2023. (ldb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hunt v. Hurst et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ANTONIO HUNT, ADC #131310 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:21-cv-00181-KGB-JTK THOMAS HURST, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 6). The parties have not filed any objections, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Id.). It is therefore ordered that: 1. Plaintiff Antonio Hunt’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. The Court recommends that dismissal of this action constitute a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). So ordered this the 9th day of January, 2023. _____________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
