Dorn v. Kelley et al, No. 4:2020cv00903 - Document 60 (E.D. Ark. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 27 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; adopting 43 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; declining to adopt as moot 42 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; denying 23 motion for preliminary injunction; granting 17 moti on to dismiss; dismissing Ms. Harris and Mr. Clark as parties in this case; and denying 34 motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunctive relief. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/21/2021. (jbh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dorn v. Kelley et al Doc. 60 Case 4:20-cv-00903-KGB-JTK Document 60 Filed 09/21/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION KENNETH DORN, ADC #169545 v. PLAINTIFF 4:20-cv-00903-KGB-JTK WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney filed on December 17, 2020 (Dkt. No. 27). No party has filed objections to these Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the time to do so has passed. After a careful review, the Court concludes that the December 17, 2020, Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 27). The Court has also received Proposed Findings and Recommendations from Judge Kearney filed on March 19, 2021, and March 23, 2021 (Dkt. Nos. 42, 43). No party has filed objections to these Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the time to do so has passed. After a careful review, the Court concludes that the March 23, 2021, Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 43). The Court declines to adopt as moot the March 19, 2021, Proposed Findings and Recommendations, which addressed the same motion as the March 23, 2021, Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 42). Accordingly, the Court denies plaintiff Kenneth Dorn’s November 25, 2020, motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 23). The Court grants separate defendants Claudia Harris and Richard Clark’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 17). The Court dismisses Ms. Harris and Mr. Clark Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:20-cv-00903-KGB-JTK Document 60 Filed 09/21/21 Page 2 of 2 as parties in this case. Finally, the Court denies Mr. Dorn’s March 4, 2021, motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 34). It is so ordered this 21st day of September, 2021. ________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
