Steinman v. Velazquez et al, No. 4:2020cv00877 - Document 13 (E.D. Ark. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER approving and adopting 12 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Velazquez due to lack of service; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order adopting the Recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 01/05/2021. (ajt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Steinman v. Velazquez et al Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION KEVIN RYAN STEINMAN v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:20-cv-00877-LPR-JJV A. VELAZQUEZ, Deputy, Brassell Detention Center; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. (Doc. 12). No objections have been filed. After careful consideration of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Velazquez is DISMISSED without prejudice due to lack of service. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order adopting the Recommendations would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of January 2021. ________________________________ LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
