Reagan v. Rendon et al, No. 4:2019cv00152 - Document 17 (E.D. Ark. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice the following claims by plaintiff Darren Reagan: (1) the official-capacity claims; (2) the personal property claims; (3) the failure to follow policy claims; (4) the negligence and respondeat superior claims; (5) the access to the courts claims; (6) and the claims against defendants Bouleware, Rosales, Maruka, Hawkins, Houston, Tansy, Vance, Stoke s, Roberts, Smith, Kimbel, Benson, Blair, White, Carter, Caraway, Cohen, Sickler, Cole, Hendrix, Jones, Minor, Melton, and Cross; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/30/2019. (cmn)

Download PDF
Reagan v. Rendon et al Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION DARREN L. REAGAN Reg. #37109-177 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:19-cv-00152-KGB-JJV ARTURO RENDON, Counselor FCC Forrest City; et al., DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court are the Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 4). No objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After review, this Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Accordingly, the Court dismisses without prejudice the following claims by plaintiff Darren Reagan: (1) the official-capacity claims; (2) the personal property claims; (3) the failure to follow policy claims; (4) the negligence and respondeat superior claims; (5) the access to the courts claims; (6) and the claims against defendants Bouleware, Rosales, Maruka, Hawkins, Houston, Tansy, Vance, Stokes, Roberts, Smith, Kimbel, Benson, Blair, White, Carter, Caraway, Cohen, Sickler, Cole, Hendrix, Jones, Minor, Melton, and Cross. The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. So ordered this 30th day of May 2019. _______________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.