Jarrett v. Hutchinson et al, No. 4:2018cv00479 - Document 6 (E.D. Ark. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in its entirety 5 proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice the case; counting dismissal of this action as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/11/2018. (cmn)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jarrett v. Hutchinson et al Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ROBERT DWAIN JARRETT ADC #161225 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:18-CV-00479 BSM ASA HUTCHINSON, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney [Doc. No. 5] have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety, and the case is dismissed without prejudice. Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of September 2018. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
