Thornsberry v. Barden et al, No. 2:2020cv00239 - Document 7 (E.D. Ark. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 5 proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice Christopher Thornberry's claims; constituting this dismissal as a strike; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/22/2021. (kdr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Thornsberry v. Barden et al Doc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION CHRISTOPHER THORNSBERRY ADC #169180 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 2:20-CV-00239-BSM ROOSEVELT BARDEN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER After de novo review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Joe Volpe’s proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 5] are adopted. Christopher Thornberry’s claims are dismissed without prejudice because he has failed to state any claims upon which relief can be granted. The dismissal constitutes a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g), and it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED, this 22nd day of April, 2021. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
