Cranford v. Sanders, No. 1:2019cv00104 - Document 9 (E.D. Ark. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Cranford's 6 amended complaint; counting dismissal of this action as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/15/2021. (jbh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Cranford v. Sanders Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JACARIO CRANFORD ADC #146450 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 1:19-cv-00104-KGB BRUCE D. SANDERS, Captain, North Central Unit, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 8). Plaintiff Jacario Cranford has not filed any objections, and the time to file objections has passed. After carefully considering the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. The Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Cranford’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted (Dkt. No. 6). Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike,” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. It is so ordered this 15th day of January, 2021. Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
