Hughes v. Doe, No. 1:2017cv00068 - Document 6 (E.D. Ark. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendant Doe is dismissed without prejudice from this cause of action. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed, without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/29/2017. (mcz)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hughes v. Doe Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION DONALD HUGHES v. PLAINTIFF 1:17CV00068-JLH DOE, Nurse, Sharp County Jail DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Doe is DISMISSED without prejudice from this cause of action. 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendation and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 29th day of December, 2017. _______________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
