Muhammad-Ali v. U. S. Congress et al, No. 1:2021cv00245 - Document 23 (S.D. Ala. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Pet's objections are OVERRULED. Pet's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 11/3/21. (copy mailed to Pet on 11/3/21) (tot)

Download PDF
Muhammad-Ali v. U. S. Congress et al Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DRELIJAH J. MUHAMMAD-ALI, AIS # 180664 Petitioner, vs. U.S. CONGRESS, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. ACT. NO. 1:21-cv-245-TFM-N MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On August 18, 2021, the Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation which recommends that Petitioner Drelijah J. Muhammad-Ali’s petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. See Doc. 15. Petitioner filed several documents in response which the Court construes as objections. See Docs. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22. As such, the recommendation is ripe for review. Petitioner is a familiar presence in this Court. Though he sometimes goes by the name Drelijah J. Muhammad-Ali, he is also known as Marcus O. Taite. His objections and other pleadings are generally nonsensical and discuss the history of treason, the English Royal Crown, and denies that he is a U.S. citizen and instead Saudi Arabia. He further complains to the U.S. Congress about the courts in Mobile and argues “a conflict of interest in obeying the laws of copyright and treatise of the royal crown of England dominions courts.” He disclaims the identity forced on him at birth and wants his proper identity and forefathers recognized. Nothing in his various documents addresses the well-reasoned analysis of the Magistrate Judge as to successive challenges. Consequently, after due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, Petitioner’s objections (Docs. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22) are OVERRULED, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Petitioner’s habeas petition is DISMISSED without prejudice and all pending motions are DENIED as moot. Final judgment shall issue separately in accordance with this order and Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of November, 2021. /s/Terry F. Moorer TERRY F. MOORER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.