Bullard et al v. The Housing Authority of the City of Monroeville, Alabama et al, No. 1:2019cv00159 - Document 221 (S.D. Ala. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 210 Report an Recommendation; GRANTING in part request for dismissal; DISMISSING without prejudice claims asserted by Ashley Miller, and REFERRING case back to Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 12/1/2021. (mab)

Download PDF
Bullard et al v. The Housing Authority of the City of Monroeville, Alabama et al Doc. 221 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION YOLANDER BULLARD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE ) CITY OF MONROEVILLE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIV. ACT. NO. 1:19-cv-159-TFM-MU MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On November 15, 2021, the Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation which recommends Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 206) as to Ashley Miller be granted and her claims be dismissed. See Doc. 210. See Doc. 210. No objections were filed. Accordingly, after due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. The Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 206) is GRANTED in part1 in that the request for dismissal is granted and the claims asserted by Plaintiff Ashley Miller are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court declines the request to grant the dismissal with prejudice. The case is REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. 1 The motion for sanctions as it pertains to Plaintiff Larayn Lett was addressed by the Magistrate Judge in his order on November 15, 2021. See Doc. 209. To the extent Defendants requested dismissal of Plaintiff Lett’s claims, for the reasons stated in the Order, that request is DENIED in part as lesser sanctions were deemed appropriate. The Court concurs with that order and adopts it as the Opinion and Order of the Court denying the request for dismissal as outlined in the first motion for sanctions (Doc. 206). The Court makes no judgment as to the supplemental request (Doc. 214) as that remains pending before the Magistrate Judge. Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of December, 2021. /s/Terry F. Moorer TERRY F. MOORER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.