Thomas v. United States Probation Office et al (MAG+), No. 2:2023cv00312 - Document 25 (M.D. Ala. 2024)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1.) The 24 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2.) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plf's failure to prosecute or otherwise comply with the orders of the Court; 3.) The Dfts' 19 motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 2/14/2024. (BES)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Thomas v. United States Probation Office et al (MAG+) Doc. 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JASON THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL CASE NO. 2:23-cv-312-ECM ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On January 2, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 24) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 24) is ADOPTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or otherwise comply with the orders of the Court; 3. The Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 19) is DENIED as moot. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. DONE this 14th day of February, 2024. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
