Kister v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2020cv00414 - Document 80 (M.D. Ala. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The 79 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. The Defendants' 17 & 65 Special Reports are construed as motions for summary judgment, and the 17 & 65 motions f or summary judgment are GRANTED in favor of the Defendants; 3. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Defendants; 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 8/23/2023. (am, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Kister v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 80 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JOHN ANDREW KISTER, #264274, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL CASE NO. 2:20-cv-414-ECM ) (WO) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On August 2, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 79) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The Defendants’ Special Reports (docs. 17 and 65) are construed as motions for summary judgment, and the motions for summary judgment (docs. 17 and 65) are GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 3. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Defendants. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. DONE this 23rd day of August, 2023. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
