Taylor v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE2), No. 2:2019cv00700 - Document 54 (M.D. Ala. 2020)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The objections (doc. no. 50 ) are overruled. (2) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 46 ) is adopted. (3) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 19 , 40 ) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/21/2020. (cwl, )

Download PDF
Taylor v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE2) Doc. 54 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JOHNNY RAY TAYLOR, JR., Plaintiff, v. WEXFORD, INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19cv700-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER The plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a motion for preliminary injunction seeking medical care and a transfer to another prison to avoid retaliation from the defendants in this lawsuit. This case is before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff’s motion preliminary injunction, as renewed, be denied. before the court recommendation. are plaintiff’s objections for Also to the Upon an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the objections Dockets.Justia.com should be overruled, the recommendation adopted, and the motion for preliminary injunction denied. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The objections (doc. no. 50) are overruled. (2) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 46) is adopted. (3) The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 19, 40) is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 21st day of August, 2020. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.