Peacock v. Wexford Health Care et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2018cv01019 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows that: 1) The 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The plf's 1 motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED; 3) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the plf's failure to file necessary financial information as ordered by this court; A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 5/6/2019. (alm, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Peacock v. Wexford Health Care et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION KELVIN PEACOCK, #187315, Plaintiff, v. WEXFORD HEALTH CARE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:18-cv-1019-ECM OPINION and ORDER On April 2, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 5) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. 3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the plaintiff’s failure to file necessary financial information as ordered by this court. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Done this 6th day of May, 2019. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
