Adams v. The City of Montgomery, et al(LEAD CASE), No. 2:2011cv01122 - Document 91 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion and order granting Defendants motions for summary judgment, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, and against Plaintiff; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/27/13. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist). Furnished to calendar group & AR (terminates Jury Trial 10/21/2013).(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Adams v. The City of Montgomery, et al(LEAD CASE) Doc. 91 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION WILLIE ADAMS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, Defendant. WILLIE ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:11-CV-1122-WKW (LEAD CASE) (WO) CASE NO. 2:12-CV-523-WKW (MEMBER CASE) (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, and against Plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dockets.Justia.com DONE this 27th day of September, 2013. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
