Berry v. Beckman et al (INMATE 3), No. 1:2023cv00282 - Document 10 (M.D. Ala. 2023)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plf's failure to pay the initial partial filing fee or otherwise comply with the orders of the Court; 3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot; A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/18/2023. (bes, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Berry v. Beckman et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JIMMY LAMAR BERRY, AIS 263622, Plaintiff, v. RANDALL BECKMAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL CASE NO. 1:23-cv-282-ECM ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER On September 11, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 9) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 9) is ADOPTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the initial partial filing fee or otherwise comply with the orders of the Court; 3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. A separate Final Judgment will be entered. DONE this 18th day of October, 2023. /s/ Emily C. Marks EMILY C. MARKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
