Kessel, No. 98-772 (Vet. App. 2000)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 98-772 ROBERT F. KESSEL, APPELLANT , V. HERSHEL W. GOBER, ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIR, APPELLEE. Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and FARLEY, HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges. ORDER On September 20, 1999, a majority of the Court, sitting en banc, issued an opinion in the instant case affirming the April 8, 1998, decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) that denied the appellant's claim for service connection for residuals of a head injury with syncope and possible brain lesion. Kessel v. West, 13 Vet.App. 9 (1999). The Court's judgment was entered on October 13, 1999. The appellant appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit). After submission of the appeal to the Federal Circuit, but before that court issued a decision, the appellant died. On August 14, 2000, the Federal Circuit issued an order dismissing the appeal and denying a motion for substitution of heirs in the pending appeal. Kessel v. Gober, No. 00-7011 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 14, 2000). This Court held in Landicho v. Brown that when a veteran dies during the pendency of the appeal, the appropriate remedy is to vacate the Board decision from which the appeal was taken and to dismiss the appeal. 7 Vet.App. 42, 54 (1994); see also Morton v. Gober, __ Vet.App. __, No. 961517 (Nov. 6, 2000). Such action ensures that the Board decision and the underlying regional office (RO) decision(s) will have no preclusive effect in the adjudication of any accrued-benefits claims derived from the veteran's entitlements. It also nullifies the previous merits adjudication by the RO because that decision was subsumed in the Board decision. See Yoma v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 298 (1995) (relying on Robinette v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 69, 80 (1995)); see also Hudgins v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 365, 368 (1995) (per curiam order). Based upon the foregoing, sua sponte, it is ORDERED that the Court's judgment in the instant case is recalled and its September 20, 1999, opinion is withdrawn. It is further ORDERED that the April 8, 1998, decision of the Board is VACATED. It is further ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. DATED: November 20, 2000 PER CURIAM. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
