STEWART v. US , No. 24-1304 (Fed. Cir. 2024)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 24-1304 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 04/10/2024 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CHRISTOPHER STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2024-1304 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:23-cv-00934-DAT, Judge David A. Tapp. ______________________ Before DYK, WALLACH, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER In response to this court’s January 22, 2024 show cause order, the United States urges dismissal of this appeal as untimely. Christopher Stewart has not responded. Mr. Stewart filed a complaint at the United States Court of Federal Claims, alleging violations by the “United States District Court.” Compl. at 2. Among other cases, Mr. Stewart identified Stewart v. Quality Carriers, Inc., No. 3:19-cv-0606 (M.D. La.) (“the -0606 action”), a case involving a private defendant involved in a motor vehicle Case: 24-1304 2 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 04/10/2024 STEWART v. US accident. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed Mr. Stewart’s complaint and entered judgment on July 14, 2023. On December 26, 2023, Mr. Stewart filed a notice of appeal from “the Order Granting With[]draw” entered on “11/14/2023,” identifying both his case before the Court of Federal Claims and the -0606 action. ECF No. 1-2 at 1. A party seeking appellate review must comply with the “linked jurisdictional provisions” of Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 765 (2001). Rule 3 requires a notice of appeal to designate “the judgment” or “appealable order” from “which the appeal is taken.” Fed R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B). Rule 4 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2107, 2522 further require that an appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims must be filed within 60 days of the final judgment or order being appealed if one of the parties is the United States. These requirements are “jurisdictional in nature,” and their “satisfaction is a prerequisite to appellate review.” Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248 (1992) (citation omitted); see also Marandola v. United States, 518 F.3d 913, 914–15 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (citation omitted). Mr. Stewart failed to satisfy these requirements. His notice of appeal was filed more than 60 days from the entry of judgment in this case. And while it was filed within 60 days of November 14, 2023, no order from that date or anything close appears on the Court of Federal Claims’s docket. * We must therefore dismiss the appeal. We note that to the extent Mr. Stewart was attempting to appeal from the -0606 action, the notice also is untimely because it was filed more than one year after the latest docket entry in the -0606 action. See 28 U.S.C. * Case: 24-1304 STEWART Document: 5 Page: 3 Filed: 04/10/2024 v. US 3 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT April 10, 2024 Date § 2107(a) (providing for 30 days to appeal when the suit does not include the United States as a party).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
