SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC v. HULU, LLC , No. 22-2120 (Fed. Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 22-2120 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 04/05/2024 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD., Appellants v. HULU, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2022-2120 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM202000028. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MINGHUI YANG, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL, STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA. BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN; Case: 22-2120 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 04/05/2024 NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA; AMY LIANG, San Francisco, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 5, 2024 Date

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.