ANALOG DEVICES, INC. v. VIDAL , No. 22-1612 (Fed. Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 22-1612 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 04/05/2024 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ANALOG DEVICES, INC., Appellant v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2022-1612 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR202001561. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JANINE A. CARLAN, ArentFox Schiff LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by TANIEL E. ANDERSON, JASJIT S. VIDWAN. PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by PETER J. AYERS, Case: 22-1612 Document: 55 Page: 2 Filed: 04/05/2024 BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, WILLIAM LAMARCA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 5, 2024 Date

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.