DATATREASURY CORPORATION v. FISERV, INC. , No. 16-1229 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DATATREASURY CORPORATION, Appellant v. FISERV, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2016-1229, 2016-1230 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. CBM2014-00087, CBM2014-00088. ______________________ Decided: October 13, 2016 ______________________ EDWARD K. CHIN, Albritton Law Firm, Longview, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by DEREK TOD GILLILAND, Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, Daingerfield, TX; CHRISTIAN JOHN HURT, Dallas, TX. DAVID ALAN ROODMAN, Bryan Cave LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH C. CARVER, EMMA CATHRENE HARTY, NICK E. WILLIAMSON; ROBERT GERARD LANCASTER, Santa Monica, CA. ______________________ 2 DATATREASURY CORPORATION v. FISERV, INC. Before MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. We deny the appeal as moot in light of our order in DataTreasury Corp. v. Fidelity National Information, No. 16-1046.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.