REBISH v. MSPB , No. 14-3085 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on June 3, 2014.
Download PDF
Case: 14-3085 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 10/03/2014 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JIMMI TYLER REBISH, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. ______________________ 2014-3085 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-1221-13-0494-W-1. --------------------------------------------------------------------JIMMI TYLER REBISH, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. ______________________ 2014-3087 ______________________ Case: 14-3085 Document: 24 Page: 2 2 Filed: 10/03/2014 REBISH v. MSPB Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-0752-13-0362-I-1. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ PER CURIAM. ORDER Jimmi Tyler Rebish moves to reconsider his prior motions in the above-captioned petitions for review. In particular, Rebish asks the court to reconsider its July 18, 2014 order denying his request to transfer to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service or the U.S. Department of the Interior s Office of Collaborative Action and Dispute Resolution. Rebish also requests a 90-day stay of proceedings so he can obtain legal counsel. The court notes that the order for which Rebish seeks reconsideration was issued on July 18, 2014. Because Rebish s motion for reconsideration is untimely, the court will not consider the merits of the motion. See Fed. Cir. R. 27(l). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion for reconsideration is denied. (2) Rebish s motion for a stay is granted to the extent that he may file his reply briefs within 90 days of the date of filing of this order. No further extensions should be anticipated. Case: 14-3085 REBISH Document: 24 Page: 3 Filed: 10/03/2014 v. MSPB 3 FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court s30
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
