IN RE: GRAFF , No. 14-1288 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on February 24, 2015.
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE RICHARD A. GRAFF ______________________ 2014-1288 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 10/885,569. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MICHAEL K. MUTTER, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, of Falls Church, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was D. RICHARD ANDERSON. Of counsel on the brief was PETER K. TRYNA, Peter K. Trzyna Law Office P.C., of Chicago, Illinois. JOSEPH MATEL, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solicitor, and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 8, 2014 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
